Scope comparison
      Back to home
      1. OPW Knowledge Centre : Your Self-Service Help Desk
      2. Comparison
      3. Scope comparison

      Optisan CP Compact 10x32 SFP vs. Falcon Optics ENDURA 1-10x24i SFP for HFT

      Comparison: Optisan CP Compact 10x32 SFP vs. Falcon Optics ENDURA 1-10x24i SFP for HFT

      When comparing the Optisan CP Compact 10x32 SFP and the Falcon Optics ENDURA 1-10x24i SFP for Hunter Field Target (HFT), both scopes bring unique strengths tailored to different shooting techniques. However, their utility lies in meeting specific preferences and demands of HFT shooters.
      Optisan CP Compact 10x32 SFP
      • Magnification:
        Fixed at 10x, the Optisan CP offers simplicity and consistency, features highly valued in HFT. With no variable zoom, distractions are minimized, allowing the shooter to focus on accurate and reliable performance during competition.
      • Objective Lens:
        The 32mm lens allows excellent light transmission, which is beneficial for low-light conditions often encountered in outdoor shooting environments. While the larger lens slightly narrows the field of view compared to smaller objectives, it ensures a bright, clear image essential for precise target acquisition.
      • Parallax Adjustment:
        A defining feature of the Optisan CP is its adjustable parallax. This capability is crucial in HFT, especially for shooters who use techniques like blur-ranging to estimate target distances accurately. The ability to fine-tune the focus ensures sharp clarity across varying distances, enhancing accuracy.
      • Target Audience:
        The Optisan CP is ideal for shooters who prioritize precision, sharp focus, and consistent performance. It is particularly well-suited for those employing range-estimation techniques and who value a dependable, no-nonsense scope optimized for HFT competition distances.
      Falcon Optics ENDURA 1-10x24i SFP
      • Magnification:
        The 1-10x variable magnification provides flexibility for a range of shooting disciplines. For HFT, however, where mid-competition magnification changes are not allowed, this feature primarily serves pre-match customization, letting shooters adapt the scope to their preferences or specific course requirements.
      • Objective Lens:
        With a 24mm objective lens, the Falcon ENDURA offers a wider depth of field, ensuring clarity across a broad range of distances. While its light-gathering capability is slightly less than the Optisan’s 32mm lens, the wider field enhances situational awareness and adaptability, especially for shooters who favor an expansive view.
      • Parallax:
        Unlike the Optisan, the Falcon ENDURA has fixed parallax, which may limit its utility in HFT where range estimation often relies on adjustable parallax. Shooters who lean heavily on parallax adjustment for precision might find this a disadvantage in competitive settings.
      • Reticle:
        The Falcon’s illuminated reticle (“i” in its name) adds versatility by improving visibility in specific lighting conditions. While this feature is more relevant in other disciplines or practice scenarios, its application in HFT is situational and may vary based on individual preference.

             

      Comparison: Optisan CP vs. Falcon ENDURA in HFT
      1. Precision vs. Flexibility:
        The Optisan CP is designed for precision, excelling in traditional HFT scenarios. Its fixed magnification and adjustable parallax provide a sharp and focused image, which is critical for range estimation and accurate shooting. In contrast, the Falcon ENDURA offers greater flexibility with its variable zoom and fixed parallax, making it more suitable for shooters who prioritize adaptability and pre-match customization over precision-focused features.
      2. Light Transmission vs. Depth of Field:
        The Optisan’s 32mm objective lens ensures superior light transmission, making it a better performer in low-light conditions. Conversely, the Falcon ENDURA’s 24mm lens emphasizes depth of field, offering a broader range of clarity that benefits shooters who prefer consistent image sharpness across various distances without frequent adjustments.
      3. Simplicity vs. Customization:
        The fixed-magnification design of the Optisan CP appeals to shooters seeking straightforward, reliable performance without additional complexity. Meanwhile, the Falcon ENDURA caters to those who appreciate the versatility of pre-match customization and adaptability for other shooting applications beyond HFT.
      Conclusion
      When considering the Optisan CP Compact 10x32 SFP and the Falcon Optics ENDURA 1-10x24i SFP for HFT, it becomes clear that neither scope can be deemed universally superior. Instead, the value of each lies in how well it aligns with the individual shooter’s needs, techniques, and preferences, particularly regarding range-finding methods and the desired viewing experience.
      The Optisan CP Compact 10x32 SFP is a standout choice for shooters who prioritize precision and consistency. Its fixed 10x magnification is a hallmark of reliability in HFT, eliminating distractions associated with variable zoom. This feature enables shooters to focus entirely on accurate target engagement. The adjustable parallax is a significant asset, especially for those who rely on blur-ranging or other focus-based distance estimation techniques. Moreover, the 32mm objective lens enhances light transmission, providing bright and clear visuals in various lighting conditions—a crucial advantage during early morning or late-day shoots. For competitors who value straightforward, dependable equipment that excels in traditional HFT contexts, the Optisan CP Compact delivers unmatched performance.
      Conversely, the Falcon Optics ENDURA 1-10x24i SFP caters to shooters who prefer versatility and adaptability in their gear. Its variable magnification, while limited in HFT by the rule against mid-competition adjustments, offers a unique opportunity to customize the viewing experience before the match begins. This makes the Falcon an excellent choice for shooters who participate in multiple disciplines and wish to tailor their setup to varying environments and ranges. The smaller 24mm objective lens, while reducing light-gathering ability compared to the Optisan, provides a wider depth of field. This feature ensures consistent image clarity across multiple distances without frequent parallax adjustments, a significant benefit for shooters who prioritize broad situational awareness. The illuminated reticle adds an extra layer of functionality, particularly in low-contrast or challenging lighting scenarios, making the Falcon ENDURA a highly versatile tool for both HFT and other shooting activities.
       
      Ultimately, the decision between these two scopes depends on the shooter’s specific needs, shooting style, and range-finding technique. The Optisan CP Compact 10x32 SFP is the go-to for competitors who emphasize precision and clarity, especially when employing distance-estimation techniques that rely on adjustable parallax. It is a scope that embodies simplicity, making it an ideal choice for those who value consistency and minimal distractions during a competition
      In contrast, the Falcon Optics ENDURA 1-10x24i SFP is more aligned with the preferences of shooters who seek flexibility and a more dynamic viewing experience. Its versatility extends beyond HFT, making it a strong contender for those who participate in multiple shooting disciplines and value adaptability in their equipment. For HFT shooters who prefer a wider depth of field and appreciate the option to customize their setup for specific courses, the Falcon is a compelling choice.
      In conclusion, the Optisan CP Compact 10x32 SFP and the Falcon Optics ENDURA 1-10x24i SFP are both excellent scopes, each excelling in different areas. The choice comes down to the shooter’s priorities: precision and consistency with the Optisan, or flexibility and adaptability with the Falcon. Understanding one’s range-finding technique and desired viewing experience will ultimately guide the selection of the scope that best complements their HFT goals.